Part III · Chapter 19 · Final chapter of Part III

Dicke States

Read ~16 min Prerequisites Ch. 17 Tools Dicke state builder, code cell Live
Basic

One last surprise to close out Part III: the W state you spent all of Ch. 17 studying wasn't actually its own separate thing. It's the simplest member of a whole family — Dicke states — and Part III's two headline examples, GHZ and W, turn out to sit in very different relationships to that family.

The definition

The Dicke state |D_n^k⟩ is the equal superposition of every n-qubit bitstring with exactly k ones (Hamming weight k):

|D_n^k⟩ = C(n,k)^(−1/2) Σ_{|x|=k} |x⟩

where C(n,k) is "n choose k," the number of distinct ways to place k ones among n positions, and the sum runs over every one of those bitstrings.

Intermediate
Fig. 19.1 — pick n and k, see every termequal superposition, live

Set k=1 and watch the special-case note confirm it directly: that's exactly the W state from Ch. 17, just relabeled. The number of terms — C(n,k) — grows fast; try n=6, k=3 to see how quickly "every way to place k ones" stops being a small list.

Where GHZ fits — and doesn't

W = D_n^1 is a Dicke state by definition. GHZ is not a Dicke state at all — it's a superposition of two different Dicke states, the trivial k=0 and k=n cases:

|GHZ_n⟩ = (|D_n^0⟩ + |D_n^n⟩)/√2 = (|00...0⟩ + |11...1⟩)/√2

This is a clean, formal way to state something Ch. 17 only showed you experimentally: W sits inside the well-behaved, permutation-symmetric Dicke family in the most direct way possible, while GHZ straddles two trivial corners of that same family.

Advanced

Why "permutation symmetric" is the deeper property

Every Dicke state is invariant under relabeling which qubit is which — swap any two qubits' positions and the state is completely unchanged, since the definition only ever cares about the count of ones, never their positions. This permutation symmetry isn't a curiosity: Dicke states are exactly the eigenstates of total collective angular momentum that show up throughout atomic and condensed-matter physics (the name comes from R.H. Dicke's 1954 work on collective spontaneous emission), and they're an active research tool in quantum metrology today, since a Dicke state's sensitivity to a parameter you're trying to measure can, in the right setup, beat what unentangled particles could ever achieve.

Fig. 19.2 — code, runs in your browser
The full row of D_4^k for k=0..4 shows the family GHZ borrows its two ends from — confirms the chapter's central claim numerically.

End of Part III

Teleportation, LOCC, the separability hierarchy, GHZ/W, graph states, and Dicke states form a complete map of what "entangled" can mean once you're past two qubits. Part IV picks up the photonics thread Ch. 18 only gestured at — polarization beam splitters and the fusion gates that actually build graph states like the one in Fig. 18.1 out of real photons.

Check your understanding

What does |D_n^k⟩ mean in words?

The equal superposition of every n-qubit bitstring that has exactly k ones, normalized by 1/√C(n,k).

Check your understanding

What value of k turns a Dicke state into the W state?

k=1 — W is exactly D_n^1, the Dicke state with a single excitation.

Check your understanding

Is GHZ a Dicke state? Explain.

No — GHZ is a superposition of two different Dicke states (the trivial k=0 and k=n cases), not a single fixed-weight Dicke state itself.

Check your understanding

How many terms does D_5^2 have?

C(5,2) = 10 — the number of ways to place 2 ones among 5 positions.

Check your understanding

What property do all Dicke states share, regardless of n and k?

Permutation symmetry — swapping any two qubits leaves the state completely unchanged, since the definition only depends on the count of ones, never their positions.

Review queue

Scroll back to a chapter's quiz cards to review them once they're due — a full cross-chapter queue view is a planned upgrade.